绩效技术支持下的高校教师培训新模式     

陈利 《忻州师范学院学报》2007,23(2):115-116,128

绩效技术致力于提高组织和个人的绩效,在企业培训中得到了广泛的应用,取得了显著的效果。本文主要针对高校教师培训中存在的问题,阐述了运用绩效技术进行高校教师培训绩效改进的操作模式,以提高培训的效果。  相似文献   

基于教育数据挖掘的高校学生学业表现建模研究     

丁国勇  程晋宽 《黑龙江高教研究》2020,(2):76-81

在分析国内外研究的基础上,提出从社会及人口统计特征、学校环境、个人特征和学生投入等四个维度构建高校学生学业表现研究框架。以A大学为例,构建整合型教育数据系统,基于不同数据来源,应用决策树、贝叶斯网络、人工神经网络和支持向量机分别建立分类模型,并对模型有效性进行评判。结果表明,所建立的高校学生学业表现分类模型具有一定的有效性和实用价值,可为高校应用教育数据挖掘进行科学管理和完善学业支持体系提供参考。  相似文献   

The applicability of democratic principles and the mission of the university     

Torsten Husén 《Interchange》1992,23(1-2):11-18

The university's mission of serving as a fortress for freedom of speech, inquiry, and criticism of established truths is inextricably connected with democracy. Such a mission can be pursued only in a climate of genuine political and academic freedom. Three other aspects of democracy in the university are discussed: equality of access, university governance, and the public utility of the university. It is argued that equal representation or one man one vote cannot be applied in university governance because it comes into conflict with the notion of competence—a conflict that cannot be resolved by taking votes. Interest groups inside and outside of the university cannot be allowed to interfere with the free pursuit of knowledge. The internal audit, that is, peer review (by, ultimately, the international community of scholars) has to take precedence over vertical review by government bureaucracy.  相似文献   

College Students' Study Strategies as a Function of Testing: An Investigation into Metacognitive Self-Regulation     

Margaret E. Ross  Samuel B. Green  Jill D. Salisbury-Glennon  Nona Tollefson 《Innovative Higher Education》2006,30(5):361-375

We conducted the present study to investigate whether college students adjust their study strategies to meet the cognitive demands of testing, a metacognitive self-regulatory skill. Participants were randomly assigned to one of the two testing conditions. In one condition we told participants to study for a test that required deep-level cognitive processing and in the other to study for a test that required surface-level cognitive processing. Results suggested that college students adjust their study strategies so that they are in line with the cognitive processing demands of tests and that performance is mediated by the study strategies that are used.Margaret E. Ross is an Associate Professor of Educational Measurement and Statistics at Auburn University. She earned her Ph.D. in Educational Psychology from the University of Kansas. Her research interests include the role assessment plays in influencing student learning strategies, assessment issues and policy, and educational program evaluation. Samuel B. Green is a Professor in the Educational Psychology Department at Arizona State University. He holds a Ph.D. in Measurement and Individual Differences Psychology from the University of Georgia. His research focuses on statistical procedures. Jill Salisbury-Glennon is an Associate Professor teaching Educational Psychology courses at Auburn University. She earned her Ph.D. in Educational Psychology from Pennsylvania. Research interests include college student self-regulation, metacognition, and motivation. Nona Tollefson recently passed away. She was a Professor of Psychology and Research in Education at the University of Kansas and held a Ph.D. from Purdue University. Her research focused on student assessment  相似文献   

The relationship among achievement goals,standardized test scores,and elementary students’ focus in school          下载免费PDF全文

Martin H. Jones  Christian E. Mueller 《Psychology in the schools》2017,54(9):979-990

The study examined whether an academic, social, or both an academic and social focus might relate with achievement goals and academic achievement. Participants were 412 urban elementary school students. Results suggest that students with an academic focus toward school have more mastery‐approach and less mastery‐avoid achievement goals. Academic achievement (standardized test scores) did not relate with boys’ or girls’ focus toward school. These findings suggest that academic motivation, but not achievement, correspond with self‐perceptions of school as being a place to learn or school as a place for social interactions.  相似文献   

学术史书写的若干学理问题探略     

姚晓南  王玉燕 《广东教育学院学报》2006,26(1):31-34

学术史研究在世纪之交繁盛一时，至今不衰，是中国当代学术研究更为深广的阐释诉求所致。学术史研究是从历史的角度看待学术，体现的是叙事者的话语建构。学术史研究应避免唯尊学术而排斥社会、政治因素的偏向。学科发展史的研究应成为当代学术史书写的一个范式。学术史研究对于一门学科的厘定有着非常重要的意义。实证与史识、全面与客观，是学术史书写的基本原则。研究主体的学养是一种生命境界，与学术史书写状态息息相关。  相似文献   

学业优秀与不良的初中生心理健康状况研究     

张丽华  李慎秀 《辽宁师范大学学报(社会科学版)》2005,28(4):51-53

运用“中小学生心理健康量表(MHT)”对大连市普通中学的260名学业优秀与学业不良学生进行了测验和比较。结果表明：(1)总体比较，学业不良学生的心理健康水平明显低于学业优秀学生；(2)学业优秀和学业不良男女生之间总体上和各年级之间不存在显性差异。学业不良学生心理健康状况令人担忧，应给予足够的重视。  相似文献   

美国高校的学术反思与学术评价   总被引：29，自引：0，他引：29  

顾建民  董小燕 《高等教育研究》2002,(2)

20世纪 80年代末以来 ,美国高教界对美国高校中存在的学术评价日益窄化和教师奖励制度越来越片面的倾向进行了深刻反思。尤其是博耶在 90年代初发表的两篇文献 ,提出了包括发现的学术、综合的学术、应用的学术和教学的学术四种形式在内的新学术观 ,并构建了包括学者的品质、学术工作的标准、学术证明和过程的可靠性四条原则的新的学术评价体系。博耶的新学术观拓展了学术概念的内涵 ,涵盖了现代大学日益丰富的使命。他提出的学术评价四原则 ,对于纠正当前我国高校学术评价中普遍存在的简单化、公式化、数字化倾向具有重要的现实意义  相似文献   

西方大学评价的权力模式   总被引：4，自引：0，他引：4  

刘凡丰 《清华大学教育研究》2002,23(3):71-74

本文把西方各国大学评价过程中表现出来的权力分配模式（大学自治与责任的相互作用模式）分为：英国，荷兰，美国三种模式，荷兰模式备受国际高等教育界推崇，这种模式在外部责任要求与大学自治之间达到了较为理想的平衡，这有可能使大学发展起组织学习文化。  相似文献   

Cognitive style and educational performance. The case of public schools in Bogotá, Colombia     

Christian Hederich-Martínez  Angela Camargo-Uribe 《教育心理学》2016,36(4):719-737

This study analyses the relationships among educational performance, field dependence-independence cognitive style and factors traditionally associated with performance and style, to build a comprehensive model of factors associated with the levels of education performance of students in Bogotá. A total of 3003 students, of grades 8 and 10, from 62 public schools of the city of Bogotá, Colombia participated in the study. An analysis of multiple correspondences and a path analysis were carried out. A relationship between cognitive style and educational performance was found: field-independent students are more likely to obtain high-performance levels both in standardised tests and in teachers’ evaluations. The path analysis shows that there are two directions in the association: a direct path leads to a positive association: higher levels of field independence produce better performances; an indirect path leads to a negative association: higher levels of field independence produce indiscipline and, consequently, lower performances.  相似文献